Verifying IF outputs with if-check
IF includes a command line tool called if-check
that can be used to verify the results in a manifest file.
Imagine that someone provides you with a computed manifest file that they claim demonstrates the environmental impact of their software application.
You could trust them and take their results at face value, but there are probably cases where you think someone might have made a mistake or might be massaging their data in a dishonest way. Maybe you just need to demonstrate due diligence in the quality of the data you receive and use. In these cases, you can make use of if-check
.
if-check
is a single command that takes a given manifest file, sets up an environment where it can be executed, executes it, and compares the newly generated results to those in the original file. This means you can independently verify the results in the file using your own local copy of IF.
Under the hood, if-check
is wrapping calls to if-env
and if-diff
, so if you need granular control over the information flow for some reason, you could achieve the same result using separate calls to those commands.
Example
Alice is a manifest verifier. She receives a manifest from Bob. Bob is a good actor and has provided a valid file. Alice is a good cypherpunk who verifies everything.
Here is Bob's manifest:
name: bobs-manifest
description:
tags: null
initialize:
plugins:
sci:
path: builtin
method: Sci
config:
functional-unit: requests
execution:
command: >-
/home/bob/.npm/_npx/1bf7c3c15bf47d04/node_modules/.bin/ts-node
/home/bob/Code/if/src/index.ts -m manifests/plugins/sci/success.yml -s
environment:
if-version: 0.4.0
os: linux
os-version: 5.15.0-113-generic
node-version: 21.4.0
date-time: 2024-06-27T14:10:29.830Z (UTC)
dependencies:
- '@babel/core@7.22.10'
- '@babel/preset-typescript@7.23.3'
- '@commitlint/cli@18.6.0'
- '@commitlint/config-conventional@18.6.0'
- '@grnsft/if-core@0.0.9'
- '@jest/globals@29.7.0'
- '@types/jest@29.5.8'
- '@types/js-yaml@4.0.9'
- '@types/luxon@3.4.2'
- '@types/node@20.9.0'
- axios-mock-adapter@1.22.0
- axios@1.7.2
- cross-env@7.0.3
- csv-parse@5.5.6
- csv-stringify@6.4.6
- fixpack@4.0.0
- gts@5.2.0
- husky@8.0.3
- jest@29.7.0
- js-yaml@4.1.0
- lint-staged@15.2.2
- luxon@3.4.4
- release-it@16.3.0
- rimraf@5.0.5
- ts-command-line-args@2.5.1
- ts-jest@29.1.1
- typescript-cubic-spline@1.0.1
- typescript@5.2.2
- winston@3.11.0
- zod@3.22.4
status: success
tree:
children:
child-1:
pipeline:
observe:
regroup:
compute:
- sci
inputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 5
carbon-operational: 5
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 5.02
requests: 100
outputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 5
carbon-operational: 5
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 5.02
requests: 100
sci: 0.050199999999999995
child-2:
pipeline:
observe:
regroup:
compute:
- sci
inputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 8
carbon-operational: 8
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 8.02
requests: 100
outputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 8
carbon-operational: 8
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 8.02
requests: 100
sci: 0.0802
Alice runs :
if-check -m bobs-manifest.yml
And receives the response:
if-check: successfully verified bobs-manifest
Charlie also has a copy of Bob's manifest. He wants to trick Alice into thinking his SCI score is lower, so he overwrites the values in the manifest file, making them lower. Charlie's manifest looks like this:
# start
name: charlies-manifest
description:
tags: null
initialize:
plugins:
sci:
path: builtin
method: Sci
config:
functional-unit: requests
execution:
command: >-
/home/charlie/.npm/_npx/1bf7c3c15bf47d04/node_modules/.bin/ts-node
/home/charlie/Code/if/src/index.ts -m manifests/plugins/sci/success.yml -s
environment:
if-version: 0.4.0
os: linux
os-version: 5.15.0-113-generic
node-version: 21.4.0
date-time: 2024-06-27T14:10:29.830Z (UTC)
dependencies:
- '@babel/core@7.22.10'
- '@babel/preset-typescript@7.23.3'
- '@commitlint/cli@18.6.0'
- '@commitlint/config-conventional@18.6.0'
- '@grnsft/if-core@0.0.9'
- '@jest/globals@29.7.0'
- '@types/jest@29.5.8'
- '@types/js-yaml@4.0.9'
- '@types/luxon@3.4.2'
- '@types/node@20.9.0'
- axios-mock-adapter@1.22.0
- axios@1.7.2
- cross-env@7.0.3
- csv-parse@5.5.6
- csv-stringify@6.4.6
- fixpack@4.0.0
- gts@5.2.0
- husky@8.0.3
- jest@29.7.0
- js-yaml@4.1.0
- lint-staged@15.2.2
- luxon@3.4.4
- release-it@16.3.0
- rimraf@5.0.5
- ts-command-line-args@2.5.1
- ts-jest@29.1.1
- typescript-cubic-spline@1.0.1
- typescript@5.2.2
- winston@3.11.0
- zod@3.22.4
status: success
tree:
children:
child-1:
pipeline:
observe:
regroup:
compute:
- sci
inputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 5
carbon-operational: 5
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 5.02
requests: 100
outputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 5
carbon-operational: 5
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 5.02
requests: 100
sci: 0.020199999999999995
child-2:
pipeline:
observe:
regroup:
compute:
- sci
inputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 8
carbon-operational: 8
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 8.02
requests: 100
outputs:
- timestamp: 2023-07-06T00:00
duration: 3600
energy: 8
carbon-operational: 8
carbon-embodied: 0.02
carbon: 8.02
requests: 100
sci: 0.0102
Now, when Alice runs if-check -m charlies-manifest
, she receives:
if-check could not verify charlies-manifest. The re-executed file does not match the original.
Files do not match!
tree.children.child-1.outputs.0.sci
source: 0.050199999999999995
target: 0.020199999999999995
Not only can Alice see that the files do not match, she can see which values Charlie manipulated.
Running IF over multiple manifests
Alice could also run if-check
over any number of manifests in a single command, using the -d
subcommand. For a folder containing n
manifests, pass the folder path:
if-check -d /my-folder-of-manifests
Each manifest will be run through if-check
in sequence.
if-check
limitations
if-check
can verify that a manifest is correctly calculated. However, if someone really wanted to use a fraudulent manifest, they could provide fraudulent input data not output data. There's little we can really do about this - if someone provides fake input data it is out of IF's remit. This means that although the examples above are good for demonstrating how if-check
works, it's more likely to be used to check for bugs and configuration errors than it is to be used to detect fraud.